ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Does gender equality in sports matter? examining the socio-economic impact on public perceptions.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender and Social Stratification in Active Aging: Inequalities in Sport Participation and Subjective Health Among Older Adults in South Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Measuring the physical activity in the EU using a fuzzy hybrid synthetic index and an ordered probit model.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gender equality (GE) is increasingly becoming a key point on modern political agendas. While governments and civil societies strive to achieve this goal, we may be far from "perfect" equality between women and men. Sport is a good example of some of the inequalities that men and women face, such as pay, discrimination, and unequal opportunities. Methods: The study uses data from the Special Eurobarometer 525 (April-May 2022) to understand attitudes towards GE in sports (ATGEQS). By applying Fuzzy-Hybrid TOPSIS approach, and other methods like Latent Profile Analysis and Multinomial Logistic Regression, I investigate how gender, age, income, education, political beliefs and nationality affect these attitudes. Results and Discussion: The Nordic countries have the highest ATGEQS, while support for EU GE policies, left-wing views, and life satisfaction is positively related to favourable attitudes. The findings highlight the need for awareness and policies for sports participation to be created, with greater emphasis on disadvantaged groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.