ArticleStructural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal2025
Deriving Expected Values of Model Parameters when Using Sum Scores in Simulation Research.
Article in Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factor Scores in Small Samples: Recommendations and Solutions.Educational and psychological measurement · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to those of sum scores so that applied researchers can understand the advantages. Yet, researchers do not often compare sum scores and factor scores in terms of bias, a common simulation outcome. A reason for this is that sum scores are on a different scale and it is unclear how to compare sum scores to other types of scores. The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance for methodological researchers who wish to conduct research on scoring how to compute bias for sum scores by obtaining the expected values of their model parameters under a sum score model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.