ReviewRheumatology advances in practice2025
Exploring patient activation and self-management experiences in adults with fibromyalgia: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Review in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition that affects involvement in daily activities, including self-care and household responsibilities. Self-management strategies are a primary focus in treatment recommendations. However, their effectiveness depends on an individual's readiness and capacity to adopt health-promoting behaviours. This study aims to explore the experiences of adults in their self-management journey, focusing on the barriers and facilitators influencing patient activation (PA) and effective self-management. Methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted. An electronic search was performed using the following databases: CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect and AMED. The studies were screened against eligibility criteria to ensure their relevance. The quality of the included studies was assessed against the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) questionnaire for qualitative studies and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Findings from the papers were synthesized via the three-stage thematic synthesis process, and common themes were identified. Results: Nine studies with a total of 130 participants were included. Four major analytical themes were identified, including legitimizing FMS, the value of medical support, receiving peer and social support, and learning to self-manage. Conclusion: Self-management of FMS requires patients to be actively involved in managing their health. These findings highlight that support from HCPs, family members and peers helps patients learn how to self-manage and engage in health-promoting behaviours. Clinicians treating people with FMS should prioritize education, empathy and personalized support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.