ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
Designing, delivering and evaluating a specialty-specific quality improvement course for the rheumatology multidisciplinary team.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Quality improvement (QI) methodology aims to drive improvement in healthcare using a systematic approach. QI is an integral part of healthcare professional training curricula. However, many members of the rheumatology community have not accessed formal QI methodology training, including those expected to supervise QI activity. The BSR QI practical methodology workshop was created to address this knowledge gap in a specialty-specific course designed and delivered by, and for, the rheumatology multidisciplinary team. Methods: Course design centred on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement approach, 'Model for improvement', adapting materials from the well-established Trainees Improving Patient Safety through QI (TIPSQI) initiative. The course was delivered online (2021) and face-to-face (2022). Kolbs' four-stage experiential learning cycle informed course design utilizing rheumatology-specific cases and facilitated breakout rooms to teach QI tools. Kirkpatrick's four-stage model was used to design the course evaluation. Data from surveys completed before, immediately after, and 6 months following the courses, were used to evaluate the course. Results: Baseline knowledge of specific QI tools was limited. Post course evaluation demonstrated increased confidence to use and teach tools. Sustained confidence to contribute to and lead QI activity was reported. Course satisfaction was high; 100% of delegates would recommend the course to colleagues. Conclusion: This successful, rheumatology-specific QI course led to improved delegate knowledge of QI methodology and confidence in leading and teaching QI initiatives. It has contributed to building momentum in a growing rheumatology QI community of practice and to embedding a sustainable culture of improvement across the rheumatology community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.