ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2024
Predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters: a cross-sectional study among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: the traditional bone setters provide services that are commonly associated with complications that could be life-threatening. Nevertheless, these do not affect the proportion of people who patronize traditional bonesetters. This study aimed to determine the predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria. Methods: this was a community-based cross-sectional study. A four-stage sampling design was used to select 420 heads of households from Abakaliki Metropolis, Nigeria. Information was obtained using a pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire which was developed by the researchers. The study employed Chi-square test and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression. Results: less than a third of the respondents, 32.4% were willing to patronize traditional bone setters in the future and the major reasons included reduced treatment cost, 45.6% and good treatment services, 29.4%. Predictors of the willingness of heads of household to patronize traditional bone setters in the future included being aged 30-39 years, (AOR=0.5, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9), being in low socio-economic class, (AOR=2.0, 95%CI: 1.2-3.3), having patronized traditional bone setters before, (AOR=12.5, 95%CI: 7.5-20.8) and being in support of surgeons and bone setters working together, (AOR=2.7, 95%CI: 1.6-4.4). Conclusion: cost and good treatment services play roles in the patronage of bone setters. An appreciable number of respondents are willing to patronize them in the future. There is the need for bone setters to concentrate on areas of competence bearing in mind that there are measures of good in their services. They should be trained on good referral practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.