ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
AgeNet-SHAP: An explainable AI approach for optimally mapping multivariate regional brain age and clinical severity patterns in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age is a significant risk factor for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and identifying brain age patterns is critical for comprehending the normal aging and MCI/AD processes. Prior studies have widely established the univariate relationships between brain regions and age, while multivariate associations remain largely unexplored. Herein, various artificial intelligence (AI) models were employed to perform brain age prediction using an MRI dataset (n=668). Then the optimal AI model was integrated with the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) feature importance technique to identify the significant multivariate brain regions involved in this prediction. Our results indicated that the deep learning model (referred to as AgeNet) tremendously outperformed the conventional machine learning models for brain age prediction, and AgeNet integrated with SHAP (referred to as AgeNet-SHAP) identified all ground-truth perturbed regions as key predictors of brain age in semi-simulation, proved the validity of our methodology. In the experimental dataset, compared to cognitively normal (CN) participants, MCI exhibited moderate differences in brain regions, whereas AD had highly robust and widely distributed regional differences. The individualized AgeNet-SHAP regional features further showed associations with clinical severity scores in the AD continuum. These results collectively facilitate data-driven predictive modelling approaches for disease progression, diagnostics, prognostics, and personalized medicine efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.