Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093081›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

SENSITIVITY BASED MODEL AGNOSTIC SCALABLE EXPLANATIONS OF DEEP LEARNING.

Manu Aggarwal, N G Cogan, Vipul Periwal

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manu AggarwalNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8262-9341
N G CoganDepartment of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Vipul PeriwalNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are powerful tools for data-driven predictive machine learning, but their complex architecture obscures mechanistic relations that they have learned from data. This information is critical to the scientific method of hypotheses development, experiment design, and model validation, especially when DNNs are used for biological and clinical predictions that affect human health. We design SensX, a model agnostic explainable AI (XAI) framework that outperformed current state-of-the-art XAI in accuracy (up to 52% higher) and computation time (up to 158 times faster), with higher consistency in all cases. It also determines an optimal subset of important input features, reducing dimensionality of further analyses. SensX scaled to explain vision transformer (ViT) models with more than 150,000 features, which is computationally infeasible for current state-of-the-art XAI. SensX validated that ViT models learned justifiable features as important for different facial attributes of different human faces. SensX revealed biases inherent to the ViT architecture, an observation possible only when importance of each feature is explained. We trained DNNs to annotate biological cell types using single-cell RNA-seq data and SensX determined the sets of genes that the DNNs learned to be important to different cell types.

Indexed as

explainable AIglobal sensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID40093081
PMCPMC11908179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.