ArticleBrain & spine2025
Decompressive craniectomy following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective Swedish multicenter study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pre- and post-cranioplasty hydrocephalus in patients following decompressive craniectomy for ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Microsurgical Clipping in Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (WFNS Grades 4-5) Patients from Hybrid Neurosurgeons' Perspective: Clinical Profile and Functional Outcomes.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) can be a life-saving procedure. The aim of this nationwide prospective study was to investigate the use of DC in aSAH patients in Sweden. Research question: To explore the risk factors and functional outcome associated with DC in patients with aSAH. Material and methods: Patients treated for aSAH at all neurosurgical centers in Sweden during a 3.5-year period (2014-2018) were prospectively registered. Clinical, radiological and treatment-related factors with regard to DC were analyzed using Chi-Square and logistic regression analysis. Functional outcome was assessed by the extended Glasgow outcome scale one year after the bleeding. Results: During the study period, 1037 patients were treated for aSAH. Thirty-five patients (3.4%) underwent DC. At one year follow-up, 25 of these (71%) had unfavorable functional outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that poor clinical grade before aneurysm treatment, middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm, edema on the initial computed tomography (CT), and adverse events during aneurysm occlusion were independent and significant risk factors for performing DC. Discussion and conclusion: DC is relatively uncommon in aSAH patients and is related to increased risk of unfavorable outcome. However, favorable functional outcome was seen in 29% of patients with DC. Adverse events during aneurysm occlusion were significant risk factors for DC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.