ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Early Administration of Apelin Could Prevent Heart Failure Following Myocardial Injury; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Apelin-APJ Axis in Heart Failure: Mechanistic Insights, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Challenges.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Apelin/APJ Signalling as a Potential Complementary Target for Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2026Article
- Morphometric and Molecular Interplay in Hypertension-Induced Cardiac Remodeling with an Emphasis on the Potential Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and advancing cardiovascular disorder that impacts 1-2% of the worldwide population, particularly the elderly. Studies indicate that the intravenous administration of apelin may yield advantageous effects in preventing heart failure subsequent to myocardial injury. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of exogenous apelin administration on heart failure in animal models, in light of the lack of a definitive consensus on the matter. Method: An extensive search was performed in the Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases till the end of January 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and summarized the relevant articles. Outcomes related to cardiac function, including ejection fraction (EF), maximum and minimum rate of left ventricle systolic pressure (+dp/dt and -dp/dt, respectively), heart rate, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) were assessed. Findings were reported as a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: 12 studies were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that early treatment with apelin following myocardial injury significantly increases +dp/dt (SMD = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.58 to 3.15; p < 0.001) and decreases -dp/dt (SMD = -3.31; 95% CI: -4.46 to -2.17; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the administration of apelin resulted in a significant increase in EF (SMD = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.44; p = 0.02) and LVSP (SMD = 2.09; 95% CI: 0.82 to 3.36; p < 0.001), while it led to a decrease in LVEDP in the animals (SMD = -1.85; 95% CI: -2.81 to -0.88; p < 0.001). Noteworthy, apelin treatment was shown to have no significant influence on the heart rate of the animals (SMD = -0.12; 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.58; p = 0.73). Conclusion: The current study demonstrated that the early administration of apelin has the potential to improve cardiac function and mitigate the onset of heart failure subsequent to myocardial injury. Further, in vivo research is essential to lay the groundwork for the integration of apelin into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.