ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A transdisciplinary dual degree curriculum yields novel and successful learning outcomes: early lessons from training physicianeers.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mentorship needs and satisfaction of MD-PhD and MD-MSc trainees with marginalized identities: the Canadian experience.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Enhancing skill development in the medical kitchen: an in-depth exploration through the experiences of undergraduate medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolving needs in healthcare education and delivery have led to diverse MD-based dual degree programs offering trainees broader experiences and credential-based credibility after graduation. Medical schools typically implement multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary dual degree training with designs that separate the contributing disciplines chronologically and experientially. As a result, these designs fail to maximize the cohesive learning environment and outcomes possible with a transdisciplinary dual degree design, which integrates the contributing disciplines chronologically, experientially, and conceptually. Though rare, transdisciplinary dual degrees promise transformative educational outcomes and discipline convergence by dissolving traditional discipline boundaries and fostering a new learning environment and professional identity. Therefore, we hypothesize that a transdisciplinary dual degree curriculum yields novel-and potentially better-learning outcomes. ENMED, a transdisciplinary dual degree program collaboratively developed, sponsored, and implemented by Texas A&M University and Houston Methodist Hospital, is testing this hypothesis by training "physicianeers." This new type of healthcare professional trains simultaneously for the MD and Master of Engineering degrees, thereby integrating medical and engineering expertise to advance health system innovations. Supporting the hypothesis, ENMED's early experiences suggest its transdisciplinary dual-degree model leads physicianeer trainees to novel perspectives with the potential to transform healthcare systemically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.