Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092967›Full record

ArticleVirtual reality2025

Experiential learning through virtual reality by-proxy.

Nicola Veitch, Claire Donald, Andrew Judge, Christopher Carman, Pamela Scott, Sonya Taylor, Leah Marks, Avril Edmond, Nathan Kirkwood, Neil McDonnell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virtual reality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicola VeitchSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-9583-3915
Claire DonaldSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Andrew JudgeSchool of Social and Political Sciences, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Christopher CarmanSchool of Social and Political Sciences, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Pamela ScottSchool of Molecular Biosciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Sonya TaylorSchool of Molecular Biosciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Leah MarksSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Avril EdmondSchool of Molecular Biosciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Nathan KirkwoodGlasgow, Scotland.
Neil McDonnellSchool of Humanities, College of Arts, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Fiona MacphersonCentre for the Study of Perceptual Experience, Philosophy, School of Humanities, College of Arts, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly being used as a teaching and learning tool, however scaling this technology is difficult due to technological and cost considerations. An alternative approach that helps to address these problems is VR-by-proxy, where teaching takes place within a VR environment that is controlled by one lecturer and broadcast to students online. This allows the content to be accessed without specialist equipment while still offering an immersive and interactive experience. Taking advantage of the enforced move to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study evaluates the implementation of a novel VR-by-proxy disease diagnostic laboratory VR simulation within an undergraduate life sciences course in a higher education setting. Student participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the test group, who took part in a VR-by-proxy lesson; and a control group, who worked with interactive online lab manual material. We assessed improvement in learning and enjoyment through questionnaires before and after these tasks and collected qualitative data on student attitudes towards VR through focus groups. Our results indicate that although there is no observable difference in learning outcomes between the two groups, students in the test group reported an improved learning experience, confidence and enjoyment of learning. In our focus groups, confidence was understood in two ways by participants: firstly, as 'understanding' of the various steps involved in conducting a quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiment and secondly as a more general 'familiarity' with the laboratory setting. This study adds to the growing body of research into the effectiveness of VR for learning and teaching, highlighting that VR-by-proxy may provide many of the same benefits. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10055-025-01106-3.

Indexed as

Educational researchMicrobiologyPractical skillsqPCRRemote learningStudent experienceVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40092967
PMCPMC11906506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.