Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092923›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

Bridging the gap: The role of technological advances in shaping gastrointestinal oncological outcomes.

Nuno J G Rama, Inês Sousa

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nuno J G RamaDivision of Colorectal Surgical, Leiria Hospital Centre, Leiria 2410-021, Portugal. ramanuno@gmail.com.
Inês SousaDepartment of Surgical, Leiria Hospital Centre, Leiria 2410-021, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are highly prevalent and considered a major global health challenge. Their approach has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past years due to the development of new technologies that enabled better outcomes regarding their diagnosis and management. These include artificial intelligence, robotics, next-generation sequencing and personalized medicine. Nonetheless, the integration of these advances into everyday clinical practice remains complex and challenging as we are still trying to figure out if these innovations tangibly improve oncological outcomes or if the current state of art should remain as the gold standard for the treatment of these patients. Additionally, there are also some issues regarding ethical subjects, data privacy, finances and governance. Precision surgery concept has evolved considerably over the past decades, especially for oncological patients. It aims to customize medical treatments and to operate on those patients who most likely will benefit from a specific surgical procedure. In the future, to improve GI oncological outcomes, a delicate balance between technological advances adoption and evidence-based care should be chased. As we move forward, the question will be to harness the power of innovation while keeping up the highest standards of patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceGastrointestinal oncologyInnovationOutcomesPrecision surgeryTechnology

Identifiers

PMID40092923
PMCPMC11866242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.