ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program: A qualitative community-engaged planning study.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This community-engaged study explored the perspectives of residents in Oakland County, Michigan, who were experiencing poverty to understand how a proposed short-term unconditional cash transfer program may or may not influence their health and well-being. Methods: Community partners recruited low-income residents to participate in focus groups. Six focus groups with 34 participants, aged 25-82, were held in 2023. In 2024, the team used qualitative content analysis to understand the anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program. Results: Among the 34 participants, 25 (74 %) were at or below 100 % of the federal poverty level. Participants identified their health and well-being priorities broadly, encompassing physical and mental health for themselves and their families, family enrichment, and safety. Participants often described their priorities in tandem with barriers. The most cited barrier was insufficient funds, which created other social risk factors (e.g., food insecurity, inaccessible healthcare). Participants discussed using funds from an unconditional cash transfer program to address diverse social risk factors, including using funds to pay for utilities or to move to a different neighborhood. Participants described how beneficiaries may use funds to pay existing debt, but may not have the opportunity to build financial security. Conclusions: Low-income community members viewed a short-term unconditional cash transfer program as having promising, but diverse and limited, effects on individual health and well-being. Centering beneficiaries' priorities and intended uses within plans to design, implement, and evaluate unconditional cash transfers may help programs observe positive gains in health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.