ArticleBioinformation2024
Prediction of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia complications using PIERS.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (P-EP) and eclampsia (EP) result in 50,000 maternal deaths annually. Therefore, it is of interest to assess P-EP and EP complications using P-EP integrated estimate of risk score (PIERS). We categorized 60 patients into two groups: group 1, which included 14 patients with Adverse Maternal outcome (AMO) and group 2, which included 46 patients without AMO. They were evaluated using different laboratory investigations and PIERS for adverse feto-maternal outcomes (AFMO). There is significant influence of maternal health conditions on fetal outcomes, with a considerable percentage of new-borns needing intensive care and displaying indications of distress immediately after delivery. Thus, results support the incorporation of the PIERS score into standard obstetric care for patients with P-EP and associated conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.