ArticleBioinformation2024
Impact of light activation on tooth whitening using three different light sources.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tooth discolorations, whether caused by external factors, internal factors, or the individual's own acceptance of the discoloration, are often intricate in nature. The white colour of adult teeth fades as a result of alterations in the enamel and dentin. Dental aesthetics heavily relies on tooth shade. Vital teeth whitening is a much sought-after cosmetic dental procedure aimed at enhancing one's smile. Hence, our objective was to assess the effectiveness of three distinct light sources employed in dental whitening treatments. A total of 20 patients were chosen who did not have any tooth decay or sensitivity in the dentin for our trial. The VITA shade guide was used for pre-operative shade choosing. The group has been broken into four groups, namely Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D. The McInnes solution was used to treat the tooth surface in Group A. No light activation was done. In Group B, after the application of McInnes solution, it was activated with an LED light. Following the application of McInnes solution, Group C was subsequently activated using Blue-phase N. In Group D, the McInnes solution was applied and subsequently activated using plasma arc-based light, specifically red-blue light. All the assessed groups demonstrated some level of whitening effect, but the group that used plasma arc-based light showed a more pronounced change in shade rank compared to the other groups. The mean difference in shade rank between the pre-operative and 1-month post-operative stages was 2.20 for Group A, 3.40 for Group B, 5.80 for Group C, and 9.60 for Group D (p=0.026). Similarly, the mean difference in shade rank between the pre-operative and 6-month post-operative stages was 0.00 for Group A, 2.60 for Group B, 3.60 for Group C, and 9.60 for Group D (p=0.011). The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences among the groups at both the 1-month and 6-month post-operative stages. It was discovered that the type of illumination used in dental bleaching greatly affects the outcome, with some lights producing better long-term results than others. The data also show that specific light sources may boost the efficacy of tooth bleaching operations, warranting a personalised strategy depending on the light's performance over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.