ArticleBioinformation2024
Impact of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcomes among Indian women.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal body mass index is a key factor that essentially regulates pregnancy outcome with respect to maternal and neonatal health. Maternal bodies, whether underweight or obese during pregnancy, can significantly increase the risk of adverse outcomes for both mothers and newborns. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the impact of maternal BMI on pregnancy outcomes and feto-maternal complications related to various BMI categories in a tertiary care setting. Hence, we recruited 250 pregnant women and divided them into five subgroups based on their BMI. We collected data on pregnancy complications, modes of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes. We performed tests of significance between categories of BMI and clinical outcomes. Percentage distribution by BMI: normal weight 49.2%, underweight 28.4%, overweight 15.6%, obese 6% and morbidly obese 0.8%. There was significant variability in higher BMI with incidences of caesarean section, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and NICU admissions. Anaemia rates were higher in underweight women, whereas pregnancy and childbirth-related complications like PPH and macrosomia were more pronounced in obese women. Severe extremes in BMI are associated with drastic adverse consequences, both for maternal and neonatal outcomes. Effective weight management is therefore key to achieving favourable pregnancy outcomes. Low BMI increases the risk of preterm birth and anaemia; high BMI raises the risk of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders. Key strategies include preconception counselling, tailored nutrition and physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.