Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092870›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Effect of conventional physiotherapy versus strain counter for trapezitis patients.

Alok Desai, Anandh S, Dhirajkumar Mane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alok DesaiKrishna College of Physiotherapy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (DU), Karad, Malkapur, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Anandh SDepartment of Community Health, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (DU), Karad, Malkapur, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Dhirajkumar ManeStatistician, Directorate of Research, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (DU), Karad, Malkapur, Karad, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On average 38.7% of the adult population experiences neck pain due to trapezitis. Therefore, it is of interest to determine the efficacy of strain-counterstain (SCS) technique in a treatment of trapezitis. 40 participants were randomly allocated to two groups, where group 1 received conventional physiotherapy treatment, while group 2 received the experimental SCS treatment program with 20 patients each. We found that, group 2 showed significant improvements in range of motion, pain and neck disability outcome scores. Thus, that SCS can be used as a low-cost and effective treatment for trapezitis.

Indexed as

neck disabilitypainPhysiotherapystrain-counterstain (SCS)tirapazamine

Identifiers

PMID40092870
PMCPMC11904142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.