Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092869›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Effect of oral mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for early abortion among Indian women.

Bolde Aishwarya Ashok, Rajkumar P Patange, Supriya Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bolde Aishwarya AshokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad - 415110, Maharashtra, India.
Rajkumar P PatangeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad - 415110, Maharashtra, India.
Supriya PatilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad - 415110, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical and medicinal alternatives are accepted for early abortion. However, their clinical effectiveness, costs and patient experiences differ to determine a preferable method. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the oral and surgical procedure for mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol in early abortion. Hence, 150 patients were divided equally for surgical and oral methods to evaluate on the basis of questionnaire and clinical investigations. Data shows that post-operative outcome for women in both the groups showed non- significant difference among them requiring further longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

clinicallylab investigationsoralquestionnaireSurgical

Identifiers

PMID40092869
PMCPMC11904162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.