Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092857›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Evaluation of perinatal outcome for growth restricted fetuses.

Neha Hajare, Anjali Patil, Sanjaykumar Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neha HajareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad - 415110, Maharashtra, India.
Anjali PatilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad - 415110, Maharashtra, India.
Sanjaykumar PatilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad - 415110, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The usefulness of Doppler abnormalities in predicting abnormal perinatal outcomes is known. Therefore, it is of interest to assess perinatal outcomes using the fetal growth restriction and gestational age time of delivery. Hence, a comprehensive review of prenatal history and past events on 94 cases was completed using estimated fetal weight to make the fetal growth restriction diagnosis. Thus, the need for prompt treatments to improve perinatal outcomes using Doppler monitoring in growth restricted pregnancy management is highlighted.

Indexed as

abnormalitiesabnormal perinatal outcomesDopplergrowth restrictedmiddle cerebral arterymiddle cerebral artery and systolic/diastolicPerinatal Outcomespregnancy managementpulsatility indexumbilical artery

Identifiers

PMID40092857
PMCPMC11904156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.