ArticleBioinformation2024
Visual evoked potentials among Indian patients with optic nerve disorders.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optic nerve disorders comprise a large part of causes of visual impairments and can be associated with various clinical presentations. Accurate diagnosis and treatment sometimes would be achieved by using advanced techniques in diagnostic approaches such as Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP). This study therefore profiles optic nerve disorders and estimates the role VEP plays in the diagnosis and prognosis of these conditions in a rural tertiary care hospital. Hundred cases diagnosed with optic nerve disorders and 200 controls matched for age and gender were recruited from the Eye OPD. Structured questionnaires, clinical examination and VEP testing were done to retrieve information. Analysis by SPSS version 23 was carried out. In the study, the most common disorders found were optic neuritis, followed by ischemic optic neuropathy, and then glaucoma. VEP revealed statistical abnormalities concerning P100 latency and amplitude in the patients with optic nerve disorders as compared to controls. P100 latency was significantly prolonged with a mean comparison of p<0.001, while the amplitude was reduced with p<0.001 when compared to the controls. VEP is an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in optic nerve diseases. It would tend to provide objective and reproducible data, thus helpful for early detection and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.