ArticleACS omega2025
Preparation and Performance Study of 3D-Printed Glass Bead Insulation Mortar.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, based on concrete 3D printing technology, a glass bead insulation mortar that can be used for 3D printing is prepared by an orthogonal experimental design method. The effects of the glue-sand ratio, water-cement ratio, fly ash dosage, slaked lime dosage, and rubber powder dosage on the mortar's printability, mechanical properties, and thermal insulation properties, are analyzed in detail. The results show that fluidity is an important parameter to characterize the printability of thermal insulation mortar, and it was found that the mortar has good printability when the fluidity range is 150-170 mm. Fly ash and slaked lime can replace part of the silicate cement, and the appropriate amount of mixing fly ash and slaked lime can not only improve the fluidity of the thermal insulation mortar but also has the role of saving resources and protecting the environment. For the materials and equipment used in this study, through the vertical comparison of different levels of a single factor of printing performance, it can be seen that the printability of the thermal insulation mortar is best when the water-cement ratio is 2.7, the glue-sand ratio is 0.9, the dosage of fly ash is 20%, the dosage of slaked lime is 5%, and the dosage of rubber powder is 2%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.