ReviewACS omega2025
Recent Progress of Polymer-Based Biosensors for Cancer Diagnostic Applications: Natural versus Synthetic Polymers.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating wound healing rates with Cucurbita pepo leaf extract loaded electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate)/Halloysite/Chitosan/CaCO₃ composite nanofibers through in vitro and in vivo assessments.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Review
- Tetramethylbenzidine loaded PVA nanofibers strip for visual detection of hydrogen peroxide via CuJournal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Enhancing wound healing with synergistic dual-drug electrospun roflumilast and L-arginine loaded PLA/PVA nanofibers through fabrication, optimization, and in vivo assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Versatile and Selective Biomolecule Pulldown with Combinatorial DNA-Crosslinked Polymers.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Advancements in Hydrogels: A Comprehensive Review of Natural and Synthetic Innovations for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: Emerging Nanomaterials for Enhanced Cancer Diagnosis and Imaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of cancer can significantly contribute to improving therapeutic outcomes and enhancing survival rates for cancer patients. Polymer-based biosensors have emerged as a promising tool for cancer detection due to their high sensitivity, selectivity, and low cost. These biosensors utilize functionalized polymers in different parts of the body to detect cancer biomarkers in biological samples. This approach offers several advantages over traditional detection methods, including real-time monitoring and noninvasive detection while maintaining high sensitivity and accuracy. This review discusses recent advances in the development of polymer-based biosensors for cancer detection including their design, fabrication, and performance. The essential characteristics of biosensing devices are presented, along with examples for natural and synthetic polymers commonly utilized in biosensors. Furthermore, strategies employed to tailor polymers to improve biosensing applications and future perspectives for the application of polymer-based biosensors in cancer diagnosis are also highlighted. Integrating these advancements will illuminate the potential of polymer-based biosensors as transformative tools in the early detection and management of cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.