ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Preliminary Evaluation of Clinical and Non-Clinical Outcome Metrics in Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of a Non-Constant Aberration-Correcting Monofocal IOL.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of a Monofocal, Optimized, Aspheric IOL in Eyes with Different Degrees of Corneal Spherical Aberration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes after implantation of a non-constant aberration-correcting monofocal IOL and explore factors affecting postoperative satisfaction with vision. Methods: This retrospective study comprised patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of CT LUCIA 621P IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Factors affecting postoperative satisfaction with vision were evaluated, including patient demographics, clinical and non-clinical variables (visual acuities, adverse events, ocular comorbidities, general health, depression scores, personality types), and other patient-reported outcomes (visual phenomena, dry eye). Questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported visual outcomes, depression, and personality types. The outcomes of the last available clinical visit were evaluated. Results: A total of 97 patients were included, of whom 63.9% reported to be very satisfied and 30.9% were satisfied with postoperative vision. Only three patients were dissatisfied, and the reasons were mostly related to their postoperative clinical findings. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the patient's age and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Some non-clinical and clinical variables were signaling potential trends in satisfaction, but a larger cohort of patients would be required to explore them. Conclusion: Satisfaction of cataract patients implanted with a monofocal IOL remains high. When evaluating postoperative satisfaction, non-clinical factors and interactions with other patient-reported outcomes (visual phenomena or dry eye) should not be underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.