Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092743›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Patients with Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects by Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with the Standard Ultrasonic Method.

Pedro Machado Luz, Valentina Mostardeiro Lubisco, Rodrigo Leivas Lindenmeyer, Ariadne Peres Swarovsky, Anais Back da Silva, Victoria D Azevedo Silveira, Monica Oliveira Silva, Carolina Schopf, Jaco Lavinsky, Daniel Lavinsky and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pedro Machado Luz *School of Medicine, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil.
Valentina Mostardeiro Lubisco *School of Medicine, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-7400-3914
Rodrigo Leivas LindenmeyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ariadne Peres SwarovskySchool of Medicine, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil.
Anais Back da SilvaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Victoria D Azevedo SilveiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Monica Oliveira SilvaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5268-2520
Carolina SchopfSchool of Medicine, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil.
Jaco LavinskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniel LavinskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Helena Messinger PakterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Fabio LavinskySchool of Medicine, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-1794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements between spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography (OCT) compared with the gold standard ultrasonic corneal pachymetry (US CP). Methods: Adults with glaucoma and glaucoma suspects presenting with typical optic nerve head findings and high intraocular pressure with or without visual field damage were included. Patients underwent anterior segment (AS) SD-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering), AS SS-OCT (DRI-Triton, Topcon), and US CP. For both AS SD-OCT and AS SS-OCT, an 8.3 and a 3.0 mm single horizontal B-scan at the central cornea were performed and manually measured respectively. CCT was measured by three blinded different trained examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-six eyes from 16 patients with glaucoma and glacuoma suspects were included. The mean (SD) age was 59.1 (10.5) years, and 87% were women. The mean (SD) CCT measurements were 548.04 (33.11) µm for AS SD-OCT, 538.88 (34.84) µm for AS SS-OCT, and 537.12 (29.20) µm for US CP. The overall agreement ICC was 0.915 (95% CI, 0.785-0.964; p<0.001). The best agreement was found between AS SS-OCT and US CP (ICC = 0.929; 95% CI, 0.849-0.967; p<0.001). When comparing AS-OCT methods with US CP, a difference of less than 10 µm was found in 53.8% of the eyes examined by SS-OCT, and in 50% of the eyes examined by SD-OCT. Conclusion: OCT emerges as an effective modality for CCT measurements. This technology provides advantages such as patient comfort, B-scan trackability, and the possibility to conduct multiple glaucoma diagnostic modalities in a single device.

Indexed as

glaucomamultimodal imagingoptical coherence tomographyultrasonic pachymetry

Identifiers

PMID40092743
PMCPMC11908400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.