ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Patients with Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects by Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with the Standard Ultrasonic Method.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements between spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography (OCT) compared with the gold standard ultrasonic corneal pachymetry (US CP). Methods: Adults with glaucoma and glaucoma suspects presenting with typical optic nerve head findings and high intraocular pressure with or without visual field damage were included. Patients underwent anterior segment (AS) SD-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering), AS SS-OCT (DRI-Triton, Topcon), and US CP. For both AS SD-OCT and AS SS-OCT, an 8.3 and a 3.0 mm single horizontal B-scan at the central cornea were performed and manually measured respectively. CCT was measured by three blinded different trained examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-six eyes from 16 patients with glaucoma and glacuoma suspects were included. The mean (SD) age was 59.1 (10.5) years, and 87% were women. The mean (SD) CCT measurements were 548.04 (33.11) µm for AS SD-OCT, 538.88 (34.84) µm for AS SS-OCT, and 537.12 (29.20) µm for US CP. The overall agreement ICC was 0.915 (95% CI, 0.785-0.964; p<0.001). The best agreement was found between AS SS-OCT and US CP (ICC = 0.929; 95% CI, 0.849-0.967; p<0.001). When comparing AS-OCT methods with US CP, a difference of less than 10 µm was found in 53.8% of the eyes examined by SS-OCT, and in 50% of the eyes examined by SD-OCT. Conclusion: OCT emerges as an effective modality for CCT measurements. This technology provides advantages such as patient comfort, B-scan trackability, and the possibility to conduct multiple glaucoma diagnostic modalities in a single device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.