Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092728›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2025

Implementing High-Quality Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer at an Australian Tertiary Hospital: Challenging the Centralisation Paradigm in High-Need Areas.

Prassannah Satasivam, Samith Alwis, Sudheshan Sundaralingam, Owen Niall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prassannah SatasivamDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Samith AlwisDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sudheshan SundaralingamDepartment of Urology, Northern Health, Epping, VIC, Australia.
Owen NiallDepartment of Urology, Northern Health, Epping, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) plays an integral role in the curative management of metastatic testicular cancer. As a major surgery, RPLND poses a risk of significant complications, particularly in the post-chemotherapy (PC-RPLND) setting. We assessed the safety of introducing RPLND as a new service at an Australian tertiary hospital. Methods: A strict protocol prioritising appropriate case selection, multidisciplinary surgical expertise and ready access to intensive care facilities was implemented to introduce RPLND. Prospective data was collected on patients who underwent PC-RPLND between October 2020 and October 2022 at the Northern Hospital in Melbourne. Primary and secondary endpoints were 30-day postoperative Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification complication rate and perioperative quality measures, respectively. Results: Six patients (mean age 28.7 ± 4.3 years) underwent bilateral template open PC-RPLND. Median node count was 17 (IQR = 16) with metastatic germ cell tumour identified in all patients on histopathology. Median length of stay was 6 days (IQR = 3) with 1 day in intensive care. No blood transfusions were required, and no 30-day CD complications were encountered. Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR = 21) with no recurrences or significant delayed complications. Conclusion: Following a strict protocol, RPLND has been safely introduced as a new service at our tertiary institution. Perioperative quality endpoints match those of high-volume international centres.

Indexed as

postoperative complicationsretroperitoneal lymph node dissectiontesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID40092728
PMCPMC11909475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.