ArticleJournal of Cancer2025
Clinical significance and immune landscape analyses of the coagulation-related gene signatures in gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common types of clinically malignant tumors and a global health challenge due to its high mortality and poor prognosis. The coagulation cascade is closely related to GC and plays a key role in the tumor immune microenvironment. However, the specific mechanisms by which coagulation-related genes involved in the occurrence and development of GC remains unclear. The data of GC patients and coagulation-related genes were obtained from the TCGA and the GSEA databases, respectively. After univariate Cox regression analysis, the non-negative matrix factorization method was used to identify coagulation-related molecular subtypes. GC patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk score groups based on median risk scores, which included six genes (PCDHAC1, HABP2, GPC3, GFRA1, F5, and DKK1). There was a significant difference in survival between the two groups, and the predictive abilities for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were valid. Here, we demonstrated that coagulation-related gene signatures are valuable in predicting the survival of GC patients. Besides, the high- and low-risk grouping also better reflects the status of tumor mutation burden and the characteristics of tumor immune infiltration in GC, which provides a theoretical basis for individualized chemotherapy and immunotherapy for GC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.