ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Improving women's team performance on corners through video training and ball trajectory anticipation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a video-based perceptual training programme designed to enhance anticipation skills in professional female football players. The video reference task was used to test participants in pre- and post-tests, where they predicted the ball's arrival location during corners. Participants were evenly divided into an experimental group, which received training in the task between the pre- and post-tests using a progressive temporal occlusion method, and a control group, which received no training. The rate of correct responses, response time, and confidence scores were analyzed in the reference task, as well as performance on corners in real matches, to assess the expected transfer of learning to the field. The results revealed that the experimental group, which underwent training, significantly improved their precision in predicting the ball's landing zone after the intervention, with their accuracy score increasing from 54% to 68% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.