Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092680›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Inconclusive effects between executive functions and symptoms of psychiatric disorders in random-intercept cross-lagged panel models: a simulated reanalysis and comment on Halse et al. (2022).

Kimmo Sorjonen, Bo Melin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kimmo SorjonenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bo MelinDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In a recent study of Norwegian children ( Methods: We reanalyzed data simulated to resemble the data used by Halse et al. with several complementary models, e.g., latent change score models (LCSM). Results: The analyzed models indicated contradictory simultaneous increasing and decreasing effects between executive deficits and symptoms of psychopathology. Conclusion: The present contradictory findings suggested that prospective effects between executive deficits and symptoms of psychopathology may have been spurious rather than truly increasing. Consequently, conclusions by Halse et al. appear to have been premature. It is important for researchers to bear in mind that correlations, including cross-lagged effects in RI-CLPM, do not prove causality. Careful interpretation of RI-CLPM results is of utmost importance in, for example, research in clinical and developmental psychology. We recommend researchers to use, as we did here, triangulation to scrutinize findings from analyses of observational data.

Indexed as

executive deficitsrandom-intercept cross-lagged panel modelsreanalysesspurious effectssymptoms of psychopathologytriangulation

Identifiers

PMID40092680
PMCPMC11907166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.