ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2025
Building absolute breast cancer risk prediction models for women treated with chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of breast cancer risk for adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We built models to predict absolute breast cancer (BC) risk in women treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We first estimated relative risks (RRs) for risk factors, including radiation dose to 10 breast segments to accommodate heterogeneity of treatment effects, using a case-control sample nested in an HL survivor cohort. To estimate RRs of case-control matching factors we developed novel weighting approaches. We then combined RRs with age-specific BC incidence and competing mortality rates from the HL survivor cohort and a population-based registry, accommodating differences between them. We compared the performance of models using segment-specific doses with using mean dose only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.