Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092588›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025

Assessing the quality of whole slide images in cytology from nuclei features.

Paul Barthe, Romain Brixtel, Yann Caillot, Benoît Lemoine, Arnaud Renouf, Vianney Thurotte, Ouarda Beniken, Sébastien Bougleux, Olivier Lézoray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul BartheDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Romain BrixtelDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Yann CaillotDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Benoît LemoineDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Arnaud RenoufDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Vianney ThurotteDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Ouarda BenikenDatexim, Caen 14000, France.
Sébastien BougleuxNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, ENSICAEN, CNRS, GREYC, Caen 14000, France.
Olivier LézorayNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, ENSICAEN, CNRS, GREYC, Caen 14000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Implementation of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms into digital pathology laboratories faces several challenges, notably the variation in whole slide image preparation protocols. The diversity of preparation pipelines forces algorithms to be protocol-dependant. Moreover, the error susceptibility of each stage in the preparation process implies a need of quality control tools. To address these challenges, this article introduces a straightforward, interpretable, and computationally efficient quality control module to ensure optimal algorithmic performance. Methods: The proposed quality control module ensures algorithmic performance by representing an algorithm by a reference whole slide image preparation protocol validated on it. Then, inspired by data description methods, a preparation protocol is represented by nuclei feature distributions, obtained for several whole slide images it has produced. The quality of a preparation protocol is evaluated according to several reference preparation protocols, by comparing their feature distributions with a weighted distance. Results: Through empirical analysis conducted on seven distinct preparation protocols, we demonstrated that the proposed method build a quality module that clearly discriminates each preparation. Additionally, we showed that this module performs well on more larger and realistic corpus from laboratories routine, detecting quality deviations. Conclusion: Even if the proposed method necessitates minimal data and few computational resources, we showed that it is interpretable and relevant on realistic corpus from several laboratories' routine. We strongly believe in the necessity of quality control from the algorithmic perspective and hope this kind of approach will be extended to improve quality and reliability of digital pathology whole slide images.

Indexed as

Automated quality controlCytologyDigital pathologyOut-of-distribution detectionWhole slide image analysis

Identifiers

PMID40092588
PMCPMC11908589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.