ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2025
Analysis of readability of the top web searches for pediatric inborn errors of fatty acid metabolism.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disorders of fatty acid oxidation (FAOD) are estimated to account for around 1 in 10,000 live births, and with modern newborn screens, these conditions are often identified in childhood. However, not all parents will receive regular medical follow-up, and varying levels of parental health literacy can influence their reliance on online resources for information. Therefore, assessing the readability of online materials is critical to ensuring accessible and comprehensible patient education. Understanding the readability landscape informs our efforts to improve the quality of online resources and to support parents and patients in navigating the diagnosis of an FAOD. Objective: Our goal was to evaluate the readability of public facing online materials concerning the 10 most common disorders of fatty acid oxidation, with consideration given to the recommended reading levels by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA). Methods: Using Flesch-Kincaid, Coleman-Liau, and SMOG readability indices, we analyzed the top 25 internet search results for each disorder. Excluding empty or paywalled content, 232 publicly accessible materials were assessed. Results: Mean readability ranged from 11.64 to 12.85, indicating generally higher complexity than recommended. Only 15.5 % of materials met NIH's 8th grade reading level guideline, and 3.9 % met AMA's 6th grade level. Variability existed between disorders, with percentages meeting guidelines ranging from 0 % to 25 % for NIH and 0 % to 8.3 % for AMA. Conclusion: Ensuring readability of online resources for rare disorders of fatty acid oxidation is crucial, particularly given the prevalence of childhood diagnosis and varying levels of parental health literacy. Parents may rely on easily accessible but potentially complex materials found through online searches, highlighting the importance of aligning online content with recommended reading levels. Improving readability can enhance accessibility and understanding and facilitate informed decision-making and optimal care for patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.