ArticleISME communications2025
Towards high-accuracy bacterial taxonomy identification using phenotypic single-cell Raman spectroscopy data.
Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation, Fermentation, and Application of Probiotics Derived from Fermented Grains.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Review
- Synergistic enhancement of Sorghum bicolor nutrient uptake and growth by microbiomes in enhanced biological phosphorus removal system and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell Raman Spectroscopy (SCRS) emerges as a promising tool for single-cell phenotyping in environmental ecological studies, offering non-intrusive, high-resolution, and high-throughput capabilities. In this study, we obtained a large and the first comprehensive SCRS dataset that captured phenotypic variations with cell growth status for 36 microbial strains, and we compared and optimized analysis techniques and classifiers for SCRS-based taxonomy identification. First, we benchmarked five dimensionality reduction (DR) methods, 10 classifiers, and the impact of cell growth variances using a SCRS dataset with both taxonomy and cellular growth stage labels. Unsupervised DR methods and non-neural network classifiers are recommended for at a balance between accuracy and time efficiency, achieved up to 96.1% taxonomy classification accuracy. Second, accuracy variances caused by cellular growth variance (<2.9% difference) was found less than the influence from model selection (up to 41.4% difference). Remarkably, simultaneous high accuracy in growth stage classification (93.3%) and taxonomy classification (94%) were achievable using an innovative two-step classifier model. Third, this study is the first to successfully apply models trained on pure culture SCRS data to achieve taxonomic identification of microbes in environmental samples at an accuracy of 79%, and with validation via Raman-FISH (fluorescence
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.