Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092575›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Assessment of Approaches Promoting Virtual Radiation Oncology Educational Content to Medical Students.

Malcolm D Mattes, Erin A Kaya, Rehema J Thomas, Avinash R Chaurasia, Sara E Beltran Ponce, Gabriel Vidal, Idalid Franco, John M Longo, Dayssy A Diaz Pardo, Raymond B Mailhot Vega and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Malcolm D MattesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Erin A KayaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Rehema J ThomasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Avinash R ChaurasiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Sara E Beltran PonceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Gabriel VidalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Integris Health Care Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Idalid FrancoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
John M LongoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Dayssy A Diaz PardoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Raymond B Mailhot VegaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Pranshu MohindraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Roberto DiazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Shilpen PatelGenentech, San Francisco, California.
Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Virtual learning in radiation oncology (RO) has potential to reach medical students who otherwise lack access to RO exposure or mentorship at their school. This study characterized the relative effectiveness of different methods of promoting virtual education content, to inform future efforts to expand access to RO education. Methods and Materials: A 4-part "Oncology Virtual Series for Medical Students" was developed to emulate an oncology interest group (OIG). All academic RO department chairs and residency program directors were asked to engage their respective Dean's office or OIG to promote to Results: A total of 660 students preregistered, and 140 attended, at least 1 session. Attendees represented 53 allopathic and 2 osteopathic US medical schools, and 18 international schools. One hundred six attendees (87%) were from schools with an affiliated RO department, and 79 (65%) with an affiliated RO residency. Fifteen schools had at least 3 students attend, with the highest number of attendees from the principal investigator's home institution (n = 10). These 15 schools accounted for 52% of all attendees, of which 10 had an affiliated RO residency. Two hundred eighty of six hundred sixty preregistered students (42%) described how they heard about the series: 87 (31%) medical school faculty, 75 (27%) social media post or email, 53 (19%) OIG, 16 (6%) SNMA or LMSA, and 15 (5%) ASTRO. Conclusions: Disproportionately high attendance was from a few schools, suggesting that radiation oncologists' individual efforts and pre-existing relationships with students, Dean's offices, and student groups are most effective for promoting nationwide virtual RO education.

Identifiers

PMID40092575
PMCPMC11904482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.