ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025
Key Insights and Implementation of a Patient-Centered Education Video For Managing Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Pilot Study.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Contemporary management of treatment-related dermatologic toxicities in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review based on evidence from 2021 to 2025.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Quality improvement in radiation therapy: translating printed patient education pamphlets to audiovisual digital resources.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Acute radiation dermatitis during head-and-neck radiotherapy: VMAT vs IMPT.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- Elevating digital patient education from feasibility to clinical efficacy.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- In Regard to Hsu et al.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- In Reply to Sengul and Sengul.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop an educational tool to improve breast cancer patients' understanding of radiation therapy (RT) and analyze its usage. Methods and Materials: A single-arm trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan with newly diagnosed breast cancer patients scheduled for RT. Patients viewed a 4-minute educational video explaining RT mechanisms, self-care for irradiated skin, treatment precautions, and radiation dermatitis toxicity grading. A QR code provided video access. The Skindex-16 (traditional Chinese version) questionnaire assessed skin reactions before, during, and after RT. A satisfaction survey was also administered post-RT. Results: Of the 57 enrolled patients, 51 completed the study. Most found the video satisfactory (90.2%) and easy to understand (86.3%). The video provided emotional support (90.2%) and reduced anxiety (84.3%). Nearly all patients (96.1%) found the QR code helpful. Skindex-16 outcomes indicated increasing discomfort throughout treatment, with a significant rise midway through RT. Patient characteristics, such as age, education, occupation, and social support, were not correlated with satisfaction, emotional support efficacy, or video-watching frequency. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in Skindex-16 scores between conventional and hypofractionated RT. Most patients (82.4%) watched the video most frequently during the first 2 weeks of RT, with 25.5% replaying it when dermatitis worsened. Conclusions: The in-house educational video enhanced patients' understanding of RT and provided emotional support, with efficacy unaffected by patient characteristics or fractionation. Patients valued QR code access. The timing of watching the video was crucial. Continuous, accessible educational materials were important as symptoms worsened at the first follow-up. This study paved the way for future clinical trials and educational tools for breast cancer patients in radiation oncology departments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.