ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
A new ensemble learning method stratified sampling blending optimizes conventional blending and improves prediction performance.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Ensemble learning, as a powerful machine learning method, improves overall prediction performance by combining the prediction results of multiple base models. Blending, as a popular ensemble learning method, can train multiple base models, input the resulting prediction results to further train meta model and obtain final prediction results. However, conventional blending divides the training set by simple random sampling, which causes bias and large variance, thus affecting the stability and accuracy of prediction performance. In this study, we propose a new algorithm of stratified sampling blending (ssBlending), which addresses the algorithm instability of conventional blending caused by the random partition of the training set, further improving the prediction accuracy. Results: We used multiple genotype data sets from different species including animal (pig), plant (loblolly pine), and microorganism (yeast) to test the prediction performance of ssBlending. The across-species multi-dataset verification results reveal that ssBlending is superior to conventional blending in terms of prediction accuracy and stability. In addition, we optimized the training set sampling rate (BestH) to facilitate the practical application of the ssBlending algorithm. In summary, this study proposes a completely new algorithm combing stratification strategy with the conventional blending, which provides more options for ensemble learning in various fields. Availability and implementation: https://figshare.com/s/23122a18dc8a35f12ff6.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.