ReviewBrain and neuroscience advances
Novel NIBS in psychiatry: Unveiling TUS and TI for research and treatment.
Review in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation in schizophrenia: current evidence, mechanisms, and future directions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental disorders pose a significant global burden and constitute a major cause of disability worldwide. Despite strides in treatment, a substantial number of patients do not respond adequately, underscoring the urgency for innovative approaches. Traditional non-invasive brain stimulation techniques show promise, yet grapple with challenges regarding efficacy and specificity. Variations in mechanistic understanding and reliability among non-invasive brain stimulation methods are common, with limited spatial precision and physical constraints hindering the ability to target subcortical areas often implicated in the disease aetiology. Novel techniques such as transcranial ultrasonic stimulation and temporal interference stimulation have gained notable momentum in recent years, possibly addressing these shortcomings. Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) offers exceptional spatial precision and deeper penetration compared with conventional electrical and magnetic stimulation techniques. Studies targeting a diverse array of brain regions have shown its potential to affect neuronal excitability, functional connectivity and symptoms of psychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder. Nevertheless, challenges such as target planning and addressing acoustic interactions with the skull must be tackled for its widespread adoption in research and potentially clinical settings. Similar to transcranial ultrasonic stimulation, temporal interference (TI) stimulation offers the potential to target deeper subcortical areas compared with traditional non-invasive brain stimulation, albeit requiring a comparatively higher current for equivalent neural effects. Promising yet still sparse research highlights TI's potential to selectively modulate neuronal activity, showing potential for its utility in psychiatry. Overall, recent strides in non-invasive brain stimulation methods like transcranial ultrasonic stimulation and temporal interference stimulation not only open new research avenues but also hold potential as effective treatments in psychiatry. However, realising their full potential necessitates addressing practical challenges and optimising their application effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.