ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Translation and Cultural Adaptation of LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module to the Indonesian Language.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity module is a patient-reported outcome measurement tool developed by the Q-Portfolio team at McMaster University, Canada, and is widely used to determine the health-related quality of life of patients with upper extremity lymphedema. However, the translation of these patient-reported outcome measurement tools to the Indonesian language has not been attempted by any institution. Methods: The Indonesian translation of the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity module was performed according to the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines. The steps included forward translation and reconciliation, back translation and review, and cognitive debriefing with cultural adaptation. The respondents in this study were recruited from Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital and the Indonesian LYMPH-Q project community. Results: A total of 2.94% of the forward-translated items were discordant at the reconciliation meeting. During the back translation review, 4 of 102 items were discordant between the original items and the back translation result. This study also emphasized Indonesian respondents' understanding of the translated items, which were influenced by sociodemographics and religious beliefs tailored specifically to Indonesian characteristics. Conclusions: The Indonesian translation of the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity module has already been conducted according to the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines, and future validation studies are necessary.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.