Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092483›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2025

Bridging the Science Practices Gap: Analyzing Laboratory Materials for Their Opportunities for Engagement in Science Practices.

Andrea L Van Wyk, Ardith Bhinu, Kimberley A Frederick, Marya Lieberman, Renée S Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Examining Science Practices in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Curriculum.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea L Van WykDepartment of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-4954
Ardith BhinuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Kimberley A FrederickDepartment of Chemistry, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-5125
Marya LiebermanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3968-8044
Renée S ColeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2807-1500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory courses provide a unique environment for students to engage in the practices of scientists and develop the skills necessary for a career in science. Research has indicated that inquiry-based laboratory activities, which allow students to make key decisions throughout the laboratory experiment, provide opportunities to develop these necessary skills and practices. This study focuses on characterizing laboratory experiments used in analytical chemistry courses for their level of inquiry and opportunities for engagement in scientific practices. Data for this analysis was collected from participants of the MICRO project, a project designed to assist instructors in adopting inquiry-based laboratory experiments. Laboratory experiments used by instructors prior to their involvement in the project and then during the semester of implementation of the inquiry-based laboratory experiments were analyzed for their level of inquiry and opportunities for engagement in scientific practices. We found that, despite an increase in the level of inquiry of laboratory materials, there was not an increase in prompted opportunities to engage students in all of the science practices. We also found that certain science practices were more likely to be prompted in certain sections of the laboratory materials, such as through the pre-laboratory and post-laboratory questions.

Identifiers

PMID40092483
PMCPMC11905284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.