ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Improving medication safety with proactive reconciliation in acute coronary syndrome patients: A randomized trial.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at an increased risk of medication errors due to the complexity of medication regimens, frequent transitions of care, the use of high-risk medications, and their vulnerability to adverse events. Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effectiveness and time efficiency of proactive versus retroactive medication reconciliation models in preventing unintentional medication discrepancies in patients hospitalized with ACS. Methods: Conducted from January to June 2024 at a specialty cardiovascular teaching hospital in West Iran, the study included 162 eligible patients admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) with a diagnosis of ACS and taking at least five regular medications. Patients were randomly assigned to either the proactive or retroactive reconciliation group (81 each). A clinical pharmacist led both reconciliation models, supported by trained pharmacy interns who conducted patient interviews to obtain detailed medication histories. Primary outcome measures included the number and types of unintentional medication discrepancies identified, as well as their potential harm. Results: A total of 654 medications were reconciled using the proactive approach, compared to 627 with the retroactive method. Among the discrepancies identified, 13 % were unintentional in the proactive group, whereas 44 % were unintentional in the retroactive group ( Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the proactive model of medication reconciliation is more time-efficient and effective in preventing unintentional medication discrepancies in patients hospitalized with ACS compared to the retroactive approach. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/74760, identifier code: IRCT20120215009014N494). Registration date: 2024-01-02.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.