Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092403›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) state policy protections and substance use disparities.

Alice Guan, Paul Wesson, David V Glidden, Rita Hamad, Judy Y Tan, Scarlett L Gomez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alice GuanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-4230
Paul WessonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7033-1038
David V GliddenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-1419
Rita HamadDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0730-4077
Judy Y TanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai, West Hollywood, CA 90069, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-1035
Scarlett L GomezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.

Funding

A lifecourse approach to evaluating the effect of structural stigma on cancer risk factors among sexual minoritiesF31CA257351 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUAN, ALICE · 2021 to 2023
$114k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA257351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) individuals have higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use than the general population. While protective social policies have been found to reduce these disparities, their long-term impact remains largely unknown. In this study, we used data from waves 3 (2001-2002) and 4 (2008-2009) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health to assess the impact of exposure to LGB state policy protections during emerging adulthood on substance use in young adulthood. Using multivariable Poisson models, we evaluated whether emerging adulthood was a critical period of exposure and quantified the relative reduction in substance use disparities between LGB and heterosexual individuals living in more protective states. Findings suggest that LGB individuals living in states with more policy protections during emerging adulthood had a significantly lower prevalence of tobacco use and binge drinking in young adulthood compared with those in less protective states. These findings were not observed among heterosexual individuals, indicating that policy effects were specific to LGB individuals. Furthermore, these protections appeared to reduce overall substance use disparities, especially among female participants. It is critical to continue evaluating policy protections to safeguard the health of the LGB community, especially considering the potential erosion of these vital protections.

Indexed as

epidemiologyLGB healthsocial policiessubstance use

Identifiers

PMID40092403
PMCPMC11907768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.