ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by repeated extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) reinsertion or not. Methods: Data from the Study of Advanced Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in the Japan II database were reviewed. Patients who received ECPR after OHCA between January 2015 and July 2021 and underwent ECPR weaning were divided into reinsertion and no-reinsertion groups. The primary outcome was the 30-day survival rate. Results: Data from 1011 patients who underwent ECMO weaning ≥1 time and survived were analyzed (12 [1.2%], reinsertion; 999 [98.8%] no-reinsertion). The reinsertion group had a longer time to first ECMO weaning (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 3.0 [2.0-5.0] vs. 4.5 [3.2-6.8] days; Conclusion: Patients requiring ECMO reinsertion tended to have poor clinical outcomes and higher healthcare costs, highlighting the need for large-scale studies to develop ECPR protocols and optimize clinical benefits and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.