ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025
Is ACTraining Behavior Analytic? A Review of Tarbox et al. (2020).
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the Disruptive Effects of Behavior Analysis on Behavior Analysis: The High Cost of Keeping Out Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Training.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- The Scope of Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis in State Licensure Laws.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- The Evolution of the Conceptually Systematic Dimension and Its Current Functions in Applied Behavior Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an effort to determine if acceptance and commitment training (ACTraining) can be called behavior analytic, Tarbox et al. (2020) evaluated whether (1) ACTraining methods can be linked to behavior analytic principles, (2) they align with the seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis described by Baer et al. (1968, 1987), and (3) ACTraining relates to items on the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) task list. We briefly address, from a pragmatic, functional-analytic perspective, Tarbox et al.'s arguments and contend that they are not sufficient to conclude that ACTraining meets the conditions under which it would be considered behavior analytic. If this is the case, ACTraining would not fall under the scope of practice of Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) and, moreover, may pose ethical problems for any BCBAs implementing ACTraining without a disclaimer that doing so is not covered by the BACB credential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.