ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Prevalence and morphology of lower second molars with C-Shaped canals: A CBCT analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between C-shaped root canal configuration in mandibular second molars and radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: a CBCT-based study in a Western Chinese population.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Imaging Findings of Clinical Significance in Endodontics During Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanning of the Upper Airway-The Anterior, Bilateral, C-Shaped, Dual of Mandibular Root Canals: A Brief Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and morphology of lower second molars with C-shaped configuration among patients at the University of Barcelona Dental Hospital using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: CBCT images of 408 patients, comprising 792 lower second molars, were examined to identify C-shaped canals and evaluate their anatomical characteristics. Inclusion criteria required patients to have both lower second molars present. The configuration of C-shaped canals was categorised at three axial root levels. The variables of symmetry, position, gender and age were analysed. Results: Out of the 792 lower second molars analysed, a total of 65 molars with C-shaped canals were identified in 42 patients, representing a prevalence of 10.2%. The prevalence in females (12.6%) was significantly higher than in males (6.5%). Bilaterality was observed in 54.76% of individuals with C-shaped molars. The C1 configuration was most frequently observed in the coronal third (56%), while the C2 configuration was equally distributed between the coronal and middle thirds (44.1%). The C3 configuration was most prevalent in the middle third (41.4%), and the C4 configuration was predominantly observed in the apical third (96%). Variations in configurations along the root were observed in 70.8% of the molars. The longitudinal groove was predominantly located on the lingual surface of the roots (83.1%). Conclusions: CBCT is a useful tool to analyse the morphology of the root canal system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.