ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Prospective Study of Functional and Radiological Outcome after Operative Management of Supracondylar Fracture Humerus in Children.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Presentation, Orthopedic Outcomes, and Microbiological Spectrum in Pediatric Septic Arthritis: A Prospective Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Timing of Kirschner wire removal in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: Is early removal a safe and effective option?Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disadvantage predicts poorer functional recovery after non-operative treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- [Effectiveness of double joystick technique assisted treatment of Gartland typeZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are the most frequently encountered injuries around the elbow with predominantly occurring in age group 5-7 years, with a higher incidence among male. Research has indicated that for displaced humeral supracondylar fractures, both closed and open reduction with internal fixation using K-wires results in more stable outcomes. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the functional and radiological outcome of operative management of supracondylar fracture humerus in children. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective study from 2022 to 2024. The study included 53 patients with close supracondylar fractures humerus who were surgically managed by either closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by K-wire fixation, cross pinning, or lateral pinning fixation. The functional and radiological outcomes were assessed by Flynn's criteria. Results: Out of 53, according to Flynn criteria out of 53 patients, 14 (26.4%) of the patients had excellent outcomes, 28 (52.83%) had good outcomes, 7 (13.2%) had fair outcomes, and 4 (7.5%) had poor outcomes. Satisfactory results in 49 patients (93.33%) and unsatisfactory results in 4 (7.54%) patients. Conclusion: CRPP is a preferred method for treating displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children due to its minimally invasive nature, ability to maintain fracture alignment, and generally favorable outcomes with complete functional range of motion and good pain relief along with fracture union. CRPP and ORIF groups had no significant difference with respect to functional outcome. Neurovascular complications most frequently occur with Gartland type 3 and type 4 extension supracondylar fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.