ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
The Role of Mentorship in Orthopedic Professional Development: From Training to Mastery.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Networking in Orthopedics: Collaboration, Opportunities, Education, and Research in Orthopedics.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Structured research training in orthopaedics: A systematic review evaluating its role in career development and academic success.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Faculty Development and Support in Orthopedic Education: A Narrative Review.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Unlocking effective decision-making and critical thinking in orthopaedics: Insights from a narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mentorship is essential to the professional and personal development of orthopedic surgeons. It promotes continuous learning, supports career development, and helps develop future leaders in the field. Our study explains key aspects of effective mentorship, differentiates mentorship from coaching, and highlights strategies to enhance mentor-mentee relationships. Materials and Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify best practices in orthopedic mentorship using established models, expert opinions, and real-world training experiences. Results: Strong mentorship positively impacts skill development, career progression, and overall job satisfaction. Key elements include structured guidance, open communication, and mutual commitment. Differences between mentorship and coaching were elucidated, emphasizing their distinct roles in professional development. Discussion: Effective mentorship programs require formal structures, clear expectations, and institutional support. Successful mentor-mentee relationships thrive on trust, regular feedback, and goal alignment. Practical strategies to strengthen mentorship in orthopedic training include mentorship training for faculty, structured pairing programs, and promoting a supportive learning environment. Conclusion: Mentorship is critical in orthopedic education and career development. Establishing strong mentorship programs can enhance learning, improve professional satisfaction, and develop future leaders in the specialty. Institutions should prioritize structured mentorship frameworks to ensure long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.