ReviewDiscoveries (Craiova, Romania)
Understanding suicide.
Review in Discoveries (Craiova, Romania). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide remains a significant public health challenge globally, requiring comprehensive approaches for prevention and treatment. Almost 90% of individuals who commit suicide suffer from mental health disorders at the time of death, emphasizing the central role of psychiatry in understanding and preventing suicide. Suicidal thoughts, planning, attempts, and completed suicides exist on a continuum, with the highest suicide rates occurring within six months after an attempt and more severe attempts increasing the risk of future suicide. History plays a significant role in shaping the perception of suicide, from considering it a sin to recognizing it as a mental illness. Emile Durkheim's ground-breaking work on suicide as a social phenomenon furthered our understanding. Knowledge regarding the complexities surrounding suicide is paramount to developing effective strategies. Early detection through clinical interviews and screening tools and creating safe spaces for discussion are critical prevention measures. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are essential for addressing underlying psychiatric disorders and reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. While significant progress has been made in understanding suicide risk factors and implementing prevention strategies, continued research and community engagement are imperative. Destigmatizing mental health discourse and fostering supportive environments are essential steps toward reducing the incidence of suicide and supporting individuals in distress. By embracing a holistic approach that integrates pharmacological and non- pharmacological interventions, along with societal engagement, we can strive towards a future where suicide is increasingly rare, and individuals feel valued, supported, and connected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.