ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
Integrative Naturopathic Treatment Model for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While specific elements of naturopathic medicine, such as botanical medicines and lifestyle interventions, have supporting evidence, there is limited quantitative data confirming its effectiveness as a comprehensive, whole-person medical approach for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Objective: This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the integration of naturopathic modalities, including modulated electrohyperthermia (mEHT), into the standard of care for metastatic CRC. We compare survival outcomes between patients at the Integrated Health Clinic (IHC) and a matched control group from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, a de-identified, publicly available cancer registry in the United States. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 131 IHC patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC and treated with mEHT between 2010 and 2021. These patients were matched with 262 controls from the SEER database using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was overall survival, with time zero defined as the first IHC treatment date (with controls assigned the time zero of their matched IHC patient) to account for immortal time bias. Survival analysis was conducted using a Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox proportional-hazards model. Results: The overall survival analysis did not achieve a statistically significant difference (HR = .76; 95% CI: .57-1.01) between the IHC (median survival time: 29 month) and SEER groups (median survival time: 18 months). Incorporating time-varying effects, the hazard ratio (HR) for the IHC group compared to the SEER group was .63 (95% CI: .46-.86) for survival <36 months, indicating a lower hazard of early mortality in the IHC group. Moreover, IHC patients who initiated treatment within 90 days of diagnosis had significantly improved survival compared to their matched controls (HR = .45; 95% CI: .28-.70). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that integrative naturopathic treatment, including mEHT, can significantly improve survival outcomes for CRC patients in the first 36 months post-treatment and when initiated within 90 days of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.