ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Molecular and serological detection of
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection of zoonotic pathogens in invasive black rats (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Indonesia is a tropical country with heavy rainfall, mostly in low-lying areas. Floods are one of the most common natural disasters in Indonesia, with climate change causing continuous flooding in some regions. The spread of human pathogens as a severe consequence of flooding, such as Aim: In this cross-sectional study, we compared DNA from the rat kidney to serum samples to identify pathogenic Methods: Fifty-nine rodents inhabiting highly populated, flood-prone suburban regions were captured inside and outside houses. Following DNA extractions, we analyzed the quantity and quality of DNA concentration from the kidney and serum specimens using a nanophotometer. The Results: The mean value of kidney DNA was 151.67 ng/µl with an average A260/A280 value of 1.836, whereas the mean value of serum DNA was 22.08 ng/µl with an average A260/A280 value of 1.233. Twenty (33.9%) kidney DNA and 10 (16.9%) serum DNA samples showed the target DNA ( Conclusion: Rat kidneys exhibited higher DNA amount and purity than the serum. Moreover, the PCR detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.