ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Modified oral implant restoration improves dental aesthetics, function, and patient satisfaction in maxillary anterior tooth loss.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and feasibility of immediate implant placement in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of modified oral implant restoration in patients with maxillary anterior tooth loss.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 patients (119 affected teeth) with maxillary anterior tooth loss from August 2021 to November 2023. Among these, 50 cases (63 affected teeth) received modified oral implant restoration (research group), while 48 cases (56 affected teeth) underwent routine dental restoration (control group). Treatment efficacy, safety, peri-implant bone resorption, periodontal pocket depth, dental aesthetics (Pink Esthetic Score, PES; White Esthetic Score, WES), masticatory function, oral function recovery, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe research group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of excellent and good outcomes, with superior PES and WES scores and greater patient satisfaction compared to the control group. Additionally, the research group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of adverse events, reduced peri-implant bone resorption, and shallower periodontal pocket depths compared to the control group. Furthermore, masticatory function and oral function recovery were also notably better in the research group.
conclusionsModified oral implant restoration for maxillary anterior tooth loss can effectively enhance restoration outcomes, improve dental aesthetics, and promote better masticatory function and patient satisfaction. It also helps prevent peri-implant bone resorption and gingival atrophy, lowers the risk of adverse events, and supports oral function recovery, making it a valuable clinical option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.