ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Standardized operating room nursing care is effective in preventing the occurrence of surgical wound infections.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the clinical effectiveness of standardized operating room nursing care in preventing wound infections from orthopedic surgery.
methodsA total of 128 patients requiring orthopedic surgery were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group in accordance with the nursing care they received during surgery, with 64 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional operating room nursing care, while those in the observation group received standardized operating room nursing care. The post-operative outcomes of patients in both groups, including wound healing rates, nursing management clinical indicators, incidence rates of wound infections and infection-associated complications, patients' mastery of infection-associated knowledge, patients' quality of life, and their satisfaction degree towards nursing care, were compared between groups.
resultsPatients in the observation group showed a significantly higher wound healing rate compared to those in the control group (P < 0.01). The nursing management clinical indicators, such as the time to first eating and first ambulation after surgery, and the duration of hospital stay were all significantly shorter in the observation group than those in the control group (all P < 0.01). The incidence of postoperative wound infections in the observation group was 0.00%, which was significantly lower than the 21.88% observed in the control group (P < 0.001). After nursing care, the quality of life scores of patients in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.01). The study also found that the overall satisfaction of patients in the observation group was 98.44%, significantly higher than 84.38% observed in the control group (χ
conclusionStandardized operating room nursing care is an effective way to prevent the occurrence of surgical wound infections. This kind of care helps patients establish healthy lifestyles and assists in improving relevant clinical indicators, which is worthy of being promoted in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.